Friday, February 23, 2024

101 Random Songs and Hymns in Shape Notes

Two posts ago in this blog, I mentioned my collection of random songs in shape notes, but once I reached 101 songs, that seemed like an auspicious number to compile into one document, which I’ve made available here as a PDF. All the songs are ones that spoke to my heart in one way or another. Often a flood of emotions would roll over me as I entered the notes and typed up the words. My wife would be in the next room and say, “Don’t cry.” “I’m not,” I would answer as I wiped tears off the keyboard. If you were to sing any of these songs and only a tiny bit of those emotions sprung up as you sang them, I feel our hearts will have understood each other. I’ve avoided songs with copyright problems, so feel free to download and share with as many people as you can get to sing with you.

Some people reading this will be familiar with shape notes and some won’t. If you’re in the latter category, there are lots of sources that explain shape notes. I’ll just mention my own explanation under the heading “The logic of shape notes” in an article I published here. If you’re in the former category, you may have such a strong association between the notation and the particular repertoire written in that notation that using shape notes to sing anything outside of that repertoire might feel odd, even scandalous. But shape notes themselves are just a device, a technology that works just as well for any tonal music as it does for 200-year-old Protestant hymns. Fortunately, history saw fit to see that certain tiny churches in remote reaches of the rural American South would preserve that technology from the early American period to the present. One thing important to me which I kept from the old-book shape-note tradition is putting the melody in the tenor line for most of the songs. I think it brings out the harmony better that way, but beyond that, I’m steeped in the old-book democratic ethos of no one part standing above the others, which is literally what “soprano” means. There are, however, a few songs that come out a non-Western tradition or are originally Western songs but so heavily influenced by their native culture that I didn’t want to mess with them other than to put them into shape notes. I did feel comfortable putting the melody in the tenor for most of the Japanese songs and the one Korean song because they’re both influenced by Western music, or in some cases of the Japanese songs, are actual European or American songs that Japanese sing in Japanese.

I know it sounds grandiose and self-important, but I’ll risk it anyway to say that I’m on a mission to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony, that is, in impassioned a cappella group harmony. In my opinion, the greatest failing of the field of public music education is that it consciously banished shape notes from its curriculum from the start, leaving to atrophy the public’s general aptitude and appreciation for singing. Society is all the poorer for it. After I dispel all the banal arguments music educators present against shape notes, I’m left with one argument that I can’t dispel: Short of religious music, there’s nothing written in shape notes to teach. While this collection has a portion dedicated to religious music, it also has a sizable chunk of secular music from which to start. From there, I intend to transpose more secular music into shape notes and would encourage others to do the same. The more that people start to sing music in shape notes, the more that music might become available in it, converting a vicious cycle of shape-note poverty into a virtual cycle of shape-note abundance.

As will be apparent from the table of contents, I arranged the songs in loose chronological order by the categories of traditional songs, songs of peace and solidarity, religious music, Japanese songs (including non-Japanese songs currently or once popular in Japan and with Japanese lyrics), and songs in other languages. The last category has one song each in Croatian, Hawaiian, Korean, Russian, and Solomons Pidgin (dialect of the Pidgin spoken throughout Melanesia). Some songs overlap two or more categories. The category just for Japanese songs owes to the fact that my mother was Japanese, that I now live in Japan, and that I have loved Japanese songs since my teenage years. The songs in non-roman script—Japanese, Korean, and Russian—have roman letters appended to their respective scripts. Of course each language, whether it uses roman letters or not, has its own sound system, but a minimum amount of research will tell the determined singer how to pronounce the words passably enough to sing them. It should be reassuring to know that all of the other languages are far more regular in their orthography than the notoriously convoluted English spelling. Under the non-English songs, I have also included English translations, rough as some of them may be.

As a last note to shape-note singers more comfortable in the four-shape system of the Sacred Harp, I put everything in the Aikin system of seven shapes, first, because it’s a little easier for me than four shapes, but second, because most people are already familiar with the seven note names and the idea of octaves if from nothing other than the Doremi Song. Regardless of the relative merits of four shapes versus seven, I think the jump to shape notes would be less high for people if it could incorporate what they already know. However, if four shapes are more comfortable with whatever singing community you’d like to try this with, the software I used to create this sheet music can also transpose everything into four shapes as well (or, for that matter, into round notes). It is called MuseScore and is freely available at the MuseScore website. To convert any song into four shapes, you would need to download its MuseScore file and open it in that program. The conversion process isn’t quite self-evident, but if anyone is interested, leave a message and I can walk you through it.

Monday, February 12, 2024

For the Joy of It: Teaching English With Shape Notes

Don’t know why I didn’t post the link to this article when I wrote it, which as nearly five years ago already, but it’s not like yesterday’s newspaper. There’s nothing about shape-note singing that is out of date.

For the Joy of It: Teaching English With Shape Notes

Wednesday, August 9, 2023

Random Songs in Shape Notes

Go here for my collection of random songs in shape notes.

Despite the sheer brilliance of shape notes as a musical notation, teachers don’t teach them because nothing is written in them. Nothing is written in them because teachers don’t teach them. There’s quite a bit of Christian church hymns written in shape notes, and quite a bit of what I'm linking to here are more hymns I found in round notes and transcribed to shape notes. It’s not out of any religious conviction that I posted more church hymns, but they are beautiful and rather easy to sing. If you sing all the parts in four-part a cappella, you get a big bang for your little buck of effort. However, to make this something that those outside of certain obscure religious groups can benefit from, I’m looking for more secular songs to transcribe and add to a shape-note collection at the MuseScore website. I’m particular to songs from the era when most shape-note music was written, that is, the 1800s and early 1900s, mainly because they lend themselves so well to communal singing. But if anyone has anything else they’d like to see in shape notes, please let me know.


Saturday, December 17, 2022

Old Japanese Songs in Shape Notes

Someone in a Japanese teachers’ Facebook group had asked if anyone had Japanese songs to share. I wrote this in response, but I think I wrote too much because not that many people had any response. I should have put it in this blog and let people decide for themselves if they want to come here and jump in. If you just want the songs, scroll down.

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Secular Music in Shape Notes, by David Warren Steel

As anyone can tell from my first post, I think shape notes are a gift to humanity and shouldn’t be limited to just tunebooks of niche communities and hymnals of small denominations. So when I read on the fasola-discussions email listserv that Warren Steel had a chapter called “Secular Music in Shape Notes” in a new book called Rethinking American Music, I naturally wanted to read it. Not patient enough to wait for it to come by interlibrary loan or even just regular shipping, I just went ahead and bought the electronic version and read it. Warren is a shape-note singer, which is how I know him, but he’s also an academic on the subject, professor emeritus of music at Ole Miss, which basically means he figured out how to get paid for doing what he would be doing anyway. If there’s anyone who would know about shape notes, it would be him. I think I laid undue expectations on him and this chapter because I was imagining a shape-note version of all the great songs of the 19th and early 20th century in unaccompanied four-part harmony, the type of songs people used to sing together before they started letting professional entertainers sing in their stead. What he found was indeed fascinating, but a lot more modest, and not even entirely secular.

Actually, a lot of the great songs of the 19th and early 20th century are religious songs, great because they were written for groups to sing, and the one place people would find themselves in a group was at church. But there was a lot of other music then that was also moving, you could even say spiritual, at least in a group setting, but not intended for church. Take for example Stephen Foster’s “Hard Times Come Again No More” with its profound empathy for the poor, or “Believe Me, If All Those Endearing Young Charms” to the words of the Irish poet Thomas Moore, about love living beyond youthful beauty: “As the sun-flower turns on her god, when he sets, The same look which she turn’d when he rose!” The beauty and the poignancy of those songs are multiplied when sung in parts. Was anything like that ever written in shape notes? I was interested in any such music I could get my hands on.

Out of the secular sources Warren cited, two are available online. One is Amos Sutton Hayden’s The Sacred Melodeon (1849). In fact I came across this one some time ago and downloaded it then. As Warren explains, Hayden was a Disciples preacher who had this idea that if you invoke God (“the Author of his being” and “the Most High” as Hayden says) while you’re learning to sing, you’re taking “his sacred name in vain” because you don’t know how to sing the song right yet when you’re just learning it. Or something like that. So this collection, and another of Hayden’s tunebooks called Introduction to Sacred Music, despite the word “sacred” in the titles, usually avoided saying “God” and “Jesus” outright. A lot of the songs are ones familiar to Sacred Harp and Christian Harmony singers, which too use a lot of language like “Author” and “the Most High,” but Hayden did so even more. So, for example, where “Exhortation (First)” in The Sacred Harp says “Up to the hills where Christ is gone To plead for all His saints,” the same song in The Sacred Melodeon goes “The world, at each returning day, Awakes again to light.”

Changes like that let you sing Sacred Harp in a secular setting, but Sacred Harp itself is often sung in secular settings with people of various religious commitments or lack thereof joining in. I don’t imagine there would be many people that say they would really want to sing the music were it not for all the references to “God” or “Jesus” (although we once had an interested Jewish student show up at a singing where someone called for Stafford to be sung, with its line “in spite of env’ous Jews.” In good faith he asked me what that meant and I didn’t really have a good excuse. He never came back. Kind of broke my heart.) A lot of the other music that Warren found was also this kind of secularizing of religious shape-note songs, some of which were written to secular texts in the first place, but not texts that were put back into the resecularized versions. And some of the music, written for Freemasons, had a lofty spiritual tone appropriate for Masonic ceremonies, but not overtly religious.

The other work Warren mentioned that’s available online is The Juvenile Harmony (1852), compiled and published by Thomas R. Weber. Neither is this one really secular, it’s just that there are a lot of secular songs in it. A weird feature of this book that Warren mentioned (he didn’t say “weird” though) is that while the songs are written in four shapes, the same four we know, some of the songs—and just some—have the seven solfège syllables printed where the words go, with the words themselves placed under the song. I wonder if Mr. Weber didn’t know about seven shapes. Or perhaps he thought his audience didn’t know them, but if they had both a feel for doremi and the concept of shape notes, you’d think they would’ve known doremi shape notes. Maybe a testament to the power of fasola at the time. Some of the songs are nice, but they’re mostly, well, juvenile. They would have been great for teaching kids, though, if the publisher could have decided which shapes to use.

It’s still a mystery to me why shape notes didn’t catch on, in the whole wide world, but especially in America where they were invented. A long time ago, Warren kindly picked me from Tuscaloosa, Alabama, to go singing in Alpharetta, Georgia, so I had about four privileged hours to pick his brain. I asked him why they don’t teach shape notes in public school and he basically said that in the early 1800s, there was a war between shape notes and round notes and round notes won. I later read up a little about all that and it seems that the main culprit was the father of music education himself, Lowell Mason. Apparently his camp was opposed specifically to four-shape shape notes, which not only did he totally not get, he wanted to elevate Americans out of the backwoods culture from which shape notes came. I think seven shapes would have been compatible with his teaching philosophy if he wouldn’t have been so prejudiced. The legacy of all that is that, no matter how much pedagogical sense shape notes make, music teachers won’t teach them because there isn’t any music written in them and there isn’t any music written in shape notes because music teachers won’t teach them.

None of the books that Warren talked about ever attained the popularity of religious shape-note books. As he says, when people in the 1800s sang secular songs from books, they preferred books without any notes at all. Maybe the whole idea of any musical notation reminded them of church, the image of which isn’t helpful when you’re trying to sing a drinking song. The harmony may have reminded them of church too. (I’m making all this up, it isn’t Warren.) But then at church, pianos and organs eventually started becoming more attractive than the harmony of unaccompanied singing. In any case, wherever churches dropped shape notes, there the whole ingenious idea died.

Singing without notes lives on today in the community singing movement where people gather to sing folk songs. There’s such a group in Birmingham, Alabama, and when I lived there, I went a few times, but it proved to be too frustrating. They use the popular Rise Up Singing group singing songbook, in which the only notation is guitar chords, as if the guitarist is the only one who actually needs to know the song. Most people just sang along with the melody, with some trying to wing an alto or bass line, but all I could think was “Show me the damn notes.” Even so, if singing can help random people become a community, that’s pretty much always a good thing. As The New York Times quoted Pete Seeger, “...I think that singing together gives people some kind of a holy feeling. And it can happen whether they’re atheists, or whoever. You feel like, ‘Gee, we’re all together.’” I call that holy.

Have you ever been in some mundane situation when suddenly you hear a cappella harmony coming from somewhere, maybe from the radio, maybe from a choir rehearsing, maybe just a pick-up singing in another room? Everyone freezes like a spirit wafted in or something. “That’s lovely,” people will say. But then they’ll just go right back to their mundane pursuits. My problem is I can’t just go back. It’s like I’ve heard the Sirens and jumped into the water, except that the water’s exquisite. “Jump!” I want to say to everyone else, whether we’re in church, on the street, in a stadium, on a bus, wherever there are people, because I can’t make harmony by myself. If we had more secular songs in shape notes, I think more people would jump. Scenes from Heaven on Earth, which I am trying to foster with secular music in shape notes.

All in all, Warren’s chapter was for me very educational, a little depressing, and helpful for understanding my task ahead. For anyone who needs the full citation, here it is:
Steel, David Warren. “Secular Music in Shape Notes.” Rethinking American Music, edited by Tara Browner and Thomas L. Riis, University of Illinois Press, 2019, pp. 50-67.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

Rebirth for Dead Letter

The longer I sing shape-note music, which is going on 23 years now, the firmer is my conviction that shape notes, those curious symbols of early America, can help instigate a cultural transformation. I have said so all over letters to the editor, email listservs, Facebook group pages, private correspondences, and other people’s blogs, but all to no avail. In fact, a member of one music educators’ Facebook group I joined apparently took so much affront to the idea of shape notes that he deleted my post.

Below is a 2018 letter to the editor I wrote to The Christian Chronicle, the newspaper of the Churches of Christ, trying to make the case for the cultural treasure they’re sitting on with their shape-note heritage and what good they could do the world if they would promote shape-note singing in the culture at large. No response. So, I thought I would just start a blog and publish it myself. Here it is:

Shape Notes for the Rest of Us

Hiding in the pews of the Churches of Christ is a cultural treasure of early America with which vast swaths of society were once familiar. It is those curious shapes in their hymnals and they hold the key to no less than a possible cultural shift, a singing renaissance with multiple benefits for a fractured and dissonant society. Easy to learn with much less training compared to conventional round notes, shape notes can facilitate an experience of which the great masses are unaware: the utter joy of communal a cappella harmony.

I am not a member of the Church of Christ and can probably count on one hand the number of times I have attended a Church of Christ worship service. I am, in fact, one of your renegade cousins in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). After our split at the turn of the twentieth century, one of the things our side lost was a strong tradition of congregational singing which shape notes greatly aided. Church of Christ congregations, being one of the greatest repositories of shape-note music in the world, are important heirs to that ingenious musical pedagogy and in a position to spread it.

Growing up in Disciples churches where the organist overpowered any thoughts the congregation may have had of its congregational voice, I never knew the power of joining in mass harmony until, for job-related reasons, I moved to the American South. In mostly tiny, mostly rural churches from the Carolinas to Texas, congregations are outnumbered by visitors who come together for the sole purpose of all-day singing. The most common of these singings uses The Sacred Harp, an oblong book of sacred songs that most hymnals purged long ago. These singings combine people for whom singing is worship, fellowship, heritage, culture, catharsis, fun, or any combination thereof, no questions asked.

The musical notation in The Sacred Harp predates today’s seven-note scale, relying instead on just four notes: mi, fa, so, and la. It has its own internal logic which makes total sense to the people who sing it, but is unlikely to win over your average music teacher. What could win said teacher over is the seven-shape shape-note system in Church of Christ hymnals, as well as in several other denominations and traditions, as it follows the do-re-mi relative scale which everyone learns in school (or at least from The Sound of Music!). With shape notes, people of pedestrian musical abilities or less can do what musicians train for years to do, and still many professionals cannot, that is, pick up music and just start singing it. No counting sharps and flats, lines and spaces just to calculate what the next note is—the shape kindly tells you.

Every music teacher, every chorus and chorus director, every community organizer no less should be on to this. All music written with notes can be rewritten with shape notes. If musicians could overcome their prejudice against what early in American history unfairly grew into a symbol of backwoods crudeness, they would amaze themselves with what they could accomplish. They would also help cure the pernicious lack of self-confidence to sing pervasive among Americans. The Churches of Christ, through their musicians, universities, publishers, and the very example of their members’ facility with this notation, can serve as the instigators for sharing the gift of shape notes with the rest of us. If people could join voices in song, then from experience they would want to join voices in song. People of seemingly irreconcilable differences would seek each other out just to sing and the world would be a little closer to that heavenly kingdom.